Cognate Set 284 – Meaning: sand

IE-CoR reference form:
*samda-
IE-CoR reference language:
Proto-Germanic
Ideophonic:
no
Parallel derivation:
no
Justification:
Earlier literature (cf. Buck 1949:22) connects Proto-Germanic *samda- cognate set 284, Greek ἄμμος cognate set 8262, and Lat. sabulum cognate set 8263 together from an original stem *samdʰo-. This etymology is followed in some recent literature (cf. Ringe 2006:11, 101) where the connection between these classes can be maintained through a reconstruction *sámh₂dʰos. On the other hand, Beekes in EIEC objects to this reconstruction on the basis of difficulties within Greek and the necessity to reconstruct IE *a. The Armenian forms in cognate set 8261 are sometimes also connected to the Germanic, Greek, and Italic ones, but alternative explanations are also possible (cf. Martirosyan 2010:149-150). It may well be possible that we are dealing with a European substrate loan into Late-IE which could be accounted for by *samh₂dʰo- (cf. Kroonen 2013:426), but the details remain quite unclear. As a consequence of the difficulties in reconciling all the proposed cognacy relations between these four branches, it is preferable to split them into separate cognate sets.
Found in clades:
Germanic
Revised by:
Matthew Scarborough
Found in 1 clade by 21 lexemes.
Language Lexeme Native script Phonetic Phonemic Notes
110   Danish sand ˈsanˀ
116   Dutch zand zɑnt
112   English sand sænd
104   Faroese sandur ˈsand̥ʊɹ
117   Flemish zand
114   Frisian sân sɔːn
122   German Sand ˈzand̥ ˈzand
103   Icelandic sandur ˈsand̥ʏr Replaced SANDR.
105   Norwegian: Bokmål sand sɑnː sɑnː
109   Swedish sand sand
121   Luxembourgish Sand zɑnt zɑnt
107   Elfdalian sand sɑnd sɑnd
108   Old Swedish sander ˈsander sander
123   German: Bernese Sang saŋ saŋ
119   Old High German sant sant sant
120   Middle High German sant sant sant
111   Old English sand sɑnd sɑnd
118   Old Saxon sand sand sand
115   Middle Dutch sant zant zant
102   Old Icelandic sandr sandr sandr
106   Norwegian: Nynorsk sand sɑnː sɑnː
References
  • Buck, Carl Darling: 22
    Connects Greek, Germanic, and Romance cognates to the same original stem *samdʰo-.
  • Kroonen, Guus: 425-426
    S.v. Proto-Germanic *samda- 'sand'. "Most forms point to *sanda- but MHG sampt can only be explained from *samda- < *samdʰ-o-, which is close to Gr. ἄμαθος < *sam-ndʰ-o- […]. Given the formal irreconcilabilities between Gm. *samda-, Lat. sabulum < *sadʰ-lo- and Gr. ἄμαθος < *sam-ndʰ- (the ψ of ψάμαθος was used to substitute s- after the Greek shift to h) the conclusion must be that the word is of non-IE origin ([Kuiper 1995](src-658):67): it was probably adopted from a set of linguistically affiliated languages when Germanic, Italic, and Greek arrived in West-Europe. In view of the meaning 'sand', it is extremely unlikely, at any rate, that the word spread across Europe as a Wanderwort."
  • Kuiper, F. B. J.: 67
  • Mallory, James P.: 499
    Cf. R.S.P. Beekes s.v. SAND: "?*samh̥ªdhos 'sand' [IEW 146 (*bhes-); Wat 8 (*bhes-); Buck 1.215]. Lat. sabulum 'sand' ?saburra 'sand in a ship as ballast', ON sandr 'sand', NE (dial.) samel 'sand bottom', OHG sant, MHG sant ~ sampt 'sand', Grk ἄμαθος 'sand'. The Greek form cannot be separated from ψάμαθος and ψάμμος 'sand', while the MHG sampt can hardly represent an old variant and, even if it is one, it can hardly be an alternative development of a PIE form. A reconstruction along the lines of *samhªdhos is impossible and the a vocalism suggests a non-IE status for the word. This is even more evident if Lat. sabulum is regarded cognate. The status of Arm awaz 'sand' is unclear."
  • Martirosyan, Hrach: 149-150
  • Ringe, Don: 11, 101
    Reconstructs *sámh₂dʰos > (cf. Gk. ἄμαθος) > *sámədʰos > *sámdʰos > PGmc. *samdaz > ONor. sandr, OEng. sand, OHG sant.
  • Scarborough, Matthew:
    Earlier literature (cf. [Buck 1949](src-47):22) connects Proto-Germanic *samda- [cognate set 284](cog-284), Greek ἄμμος [cognate set 8262](cog-8262), and Lat. sabulum [cognate set 8263](cog-8263) together from an original stem *samdʰo-. This etymology is followed in some recent literature (cf. [Ringe 2006](src-395):11, 101) where the connection between these classes can be maintained through a reconstruction *sámh₂dʰos. On the other hand, Beekes in [EIEC](src-657) objects to this reconstruction on the basis of difficulties within Greek and the necessity to reconstruct IE *a. The Armenian forms in [cognate set 8261](cog-8261) are sometimes also connected to the Germanic, Greek, and Italic ones, but alternative explanations are also possible (cf. [Martirosyan 2010](src-79):149-150). It may well be possible that we are dealing with a European substrate loan into Late-IE which could be accounted for by *samh₂dʰo- (cf. [Kroonen 2013](src-165):426), but the details remain quite unclear. As a consequence of the difficulties in reconciling all the proposed cognacy relations between these four branches, it is preferable to split them into separate cognate sets.